Voices of America

Voices of AmericaVoices of AmericaVoices of America

Voices of America

Voices of AmericaVoices of AmericaVoices of America
  • Home
  • Contest Rules
  • Judging Guidelines
  • About TAMIH
  • More
    • Home
    • Contest Rules
    • Judging Guidelines
    • About TAMIH
  • Home
  • Contest Rules
  • Judging Guidelines
  • About TAMIH

Judging Guidelines

The heart of this contest is simple: Does your story resonate about America?

 

Fiction Judging Guidelines (100 points) Revised 10-15-2025


Pass/Fail Gate (no points, required):

  • Original, unpublished work; follows all submission rules (length, format, anonymity, etc.).
     
  • No plagiarism. Quotations/epigraphs (if any) must be attributed.
     

Scored Criteria

  1. Alignment with Theme – 15 pts
    How clearly and deeply the story explores “What America Means to Me,” offering substance beyond slogans; conveys nuance, multiplicity, or tension where relevant.
     
  2. Plot – 15 pts
    Coherent, original, and engaging progression of events; purposeful stakes; avoids contrivance.
     
  3. Character Development – 15 pts
    Multi-dimensional characters with believable motivations and growth; interiority shows change.
     
  4. Setting & Sense of Place – 10 pts
    Vivid, economical description integrated into the action; place shapes characters and events.
     
  5. Originality – 10 pts
    Fresh perspective or inventive treatment of familiar themes; avoids cliché.
     
  6. Writing Style & Voice – 10 pts
    Clear, precise, grammatically sound prose; distinctive voice that enhances story.
     
  7. Pacing – 10 pts
    Balanced scene/narration/dialogue; momentum never drags or rushes key beats.
     
  8. Dialogue – 5 pts
    Natural, purposeful, character-revealing; advances plot or theme (no filler chatter).
     
  9. Emotional Impact – 5 pts
    Resonance that lingers—whether joy, grief, awe, outrage, or hope.
     
  10. Ending – 5 pts
    Satisfying and earned; resolves primary arc while leaving an intentional afterthought.
     

Scoring Anchors (use across all criteria):

  • 1 – “This should have never been written.”
     
  • 5 – “It’s ok, but…” middling execution or uneven craft.
     
  • 10 – “This is fantastic.” Exemplary, memorable, fully realized.
     

Advancement Rule: Minimum 70/100 to reach the final round.
Tiebreakers (in order): Theme Alignment → Originality → Emotional Impact → Writing Style.


 

Nonfiction Judging Guidelines (100 points) Revised 10-15-2025

Pass/Fail Gate (no points, required):

  • Original, unpublished work; follows submission rules (length, format, anonymity, etc.).
     
  • Accuracy & Integrity: Factual claims are accurate; quotes and statistics (if used) are attributed. No fabricated material.
     
  • No plagiarism.
     

Scored Criteria

  1. Alignment with Theme – 15 pts
    Directly engages “What America Means to Me,” offering clear relevance and depth (personal, cultural, historical, civic, or place-based meaning).
     
  2. Thesis/Focus & Insight – 15 pts
    A clear central claim or inquiry; delivers meaningful insight, reflection, or synthesis (beyond reportage or diary).
     
  3. Evidence, Accuracy & Attribution – 15 pts
    Concrete detail, observation, or research supports claims; sources/quotes (when present) are precise and attributed; no factual slippage.
     
  4. Structure & Coherence – 10 pts
    Logical organization (narrative arc or argumentative flow); strong transitions; purposeful paragraphs.
     
  5. Voice & Readability – 10 pts
    Engaging, lucid prose; grammar and mechanics clean; voice suits the material (reported, memoiristic, or essayistic).
     
  6. Originality of Perspective – 10 pts
    Fresh angle, lived specificity, or underrepresented lens; avoids platitudes.
     
  7. Context & Descriptive Detail – 5 pts
    Vivid scene-setting or contextual background that illuminates the point without padding.
     
  8. Emotional/Intellectual Impact – 10 pts
    Provokes thought or feeling; lingers; may reframe assumptions or invite empathy.
     
  9. Ethical Considerations & Fairness – 5 pts
    Respectful portrayal of people/communities; avoids sensationalism; handles disagreement and trauma responsibly.
     
  10. Ending/Takeaway – 5 pts
    Clear, earned conclusion that reinforces the thesis or leaves a purposeful open question.
     

Scoring Anchors (use across all criteria):

  • 1 – “This should have never been written.”
     
  • 5 – “It’s ok, but…” serviceable but thin or sloppy.
     
  • 10 – “This is fantastic.” Precise, compelling, and exemplary.
     

Advancement Rule: Minimum 70/100 to reach the final round.
Tiebreakers (in order): Theme Alignment → Evidence/Accuracy → Thesis/Insight → Voice.


Notes to Judges (applies to both categories)

  • Theme centrality matters. Reward pieces that embody the contest theme with specificity and depth, not generic patriotism or cynicism.
     
  • Economy is a virtue. Tight prose that carries weight scores higher than verbosity.
     
  • Cultural & historical sensitivity. Reward nuanced treatment of communities, histories, and contested narratives.
     
  • Consistency. Use the 1–10 anchors for each criterion; document brief notes for scores <5 or >8 to support final deliberations.

Copyright © 2025 Texas Authors Museum & Institute of History, Inc.- All Rights Reserved.

Powered by

  • Contest Rules

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

Accept